Keywords

Green Sites

Take Action For The Environment
Green Organic Energy
Opposing Views on the Environment
EcoBusinessLinks - Green Directory
Organic Portal

Social Networks

Join My Community at MyBloglog!
Yellow Pages for Stittsville, ON
Environment Blog Directory
Environmental Activism Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory
Science Blog Directory
Environment Business Directory - BTS Local
Science Blogs - Blog Top Sites


The Go Green Directory
Xoogie.netSearchSight.com

Stock Market Student






« Nuvi 255W: Green Technology? | Main | Green Gadget Love »
Tuesday
Aug042009

Heat Pumps

Heat Pumps: Why Are They Not Being Installed Everywhere?

Every energy-aware citizen immediately falls in love with the technology of heat pumps. They are an incredibly efficient and technically elegant solution to heating and cooling. Then why are they not being installed everywhere? Why would not every residential and commercial building have a heat pump?

In this article I will discuss some of the hidden issues surrounding heat pump technology. Much of the news is good. But there are some caveats that every homeowner should know about before they take the plunge into the world of heat exchange.

First, let’s review the elegance of the technology. Heat pumps move heat.. they do not create heat from combustion. If you’ve opened a fridge door then you’ve used a form of heat pump (fridges move heat from inside the fridge to the coils on the outside). Where does the heat come from with a ground source heat pump? The sun of course. Your property is constantly being baked by the sun. Rain filters through to the water table. Water flows through porous rock. This creates a constant year-round temperature of around 10 degrees Celcius once you dig down 50 feet or so. Now, imagine you put a closed pop bottle filled with 1 degree Celcius water into a 50 foot hole and then haul it back up after a couple of minutes. The pop bottle water will be around 10 degrees Celcius. Now fill the pop bottle with 20 degrees Celcius water and repeat the experiment. The retrieved bottle will also be at 10 degrees Celcius. Heat is being transferred either to the pop bottle or away from the pop bottle. Not a bad little heat pump.

Now replace the pop bottle with a series of closed pipes that push water at a rate of 5 gallons per minute down to depths of 200 feet and back again. Here is where the elegance comes in. The circulating pumps and pipes are completely filled with water+antifreeze solution (all air is bled out) and designed to tumble the water through the piping to get maximum transfer of heat between the surrounding earth and the pipe fluid. Around the pipe is a 4 inch layer of grout (usually bentonite) that ensures good contact with ground rock. By having no air in the pipes, the amount of energy needed to push the water through the pipes is minimized… in effect the water is tumbling through a siphon.

Image courtesy of Natural Resources Canada

And what about efficiency? Heat pumps are rated in Co-efficient of Performance (COP) and will have one value for heating mode and another for cooling. The rating of heat pumps is a good topic for a separate article… for the purposes of this article, all we need to know is that heat pumps can typically move 4 units of heat energy to and from the earth for every 1 unit of energy given as input. Compare this to a typical combustible furnace where 1 unit of energy (e.g. natural gas) produces about 0.8 units of usable heat energy.

Ok.. you are now convinced if you weren’t already.

So why isn’t everyone installing them? Politics? Environmental concerns? Cost?

I will not deal with any political issues. Yes, in most towns and counties you need a building permit and inspections when you install any form of heat pump. But the same goes for combustible furnace installation. I would argue that local and state/federal governments are promoting heat pumps like never before, with rebates that can add up to one third of the total cost.

Then what is stopping the hoped for explosion of installations?

My experience tells me that the main reasons are consumer fear and perceived high cost of ownership. Less prevalent reasons are the inability of the heat pump industry to truly prove environmental safety and the inconsistency of regulation and incentive programs.

Consumer fear is fueled by the fact that almost everyone knows someone who had a bad experience with a heat pump. Do any of these stories sound familiar? Home owner gets a huge electric bill because the heat pump thermostat was not set properly for cold winter nights and the auxiliary electric heat coils kicked in too early and too long. Home owner can never get the temperature just right in their home… the heat pump seems to run all the time and some rooms get too warm while others are too cool. Home owner gets taken in by repair company because home owner does not know the value of any repairs, parts or other maintenance items.

The good news is that most areas now are regulated. In Canada there is the CSA-448 specification that defines the correct installation of both the piping and heat pump. And there is now installer certification through groups like the Canadian GeoExchange™ Coalition. The technology is improving to the point where the heat pump companies (there are some excellent ones in North America) provide guidelines and product for both the thermostat control and the ducting connections for a water to air heat exchange. The old fears should no longer be a concern.

The perceived high cost of ownership is still valid but it is changing. With the rebates in place, the break-even period for a typical family residence is around 8 to 10 years or so if compared to natural gas or oil. After 8 years then the cost of heating/cooling is at least half the old cost (natural gas+electric). Add in the ability of the heat pump to supplement your hot water tank heating and you save even more. You will still require a service contract… heat pumps have a longer duty cycle than regular furnaces (they run more often) so you will need to ensure that they are tuned every year. Once again, the technology in circulating pumps and compressors has been greatly improved over the last number of years. And warranties exist to protect your investment.

So are there really no barriers to adoption? Is it really just fear of past experiences and imperceptions of pricing?

I would love to answer this question with a resounding yes but I cannot. There really are some valid concerns about both the environment and regulation.

First the environmental concerns.

There are many types of heat pump. In the United States, the air-source heat pump is common (which is effectively an air conditioner that can run in reverse). Air source heat pumps don’t work so well in Canada where the air temperature can reach minus 20.

The second common type is open loop water source heat pump. This is where instead of a network of closed pipes, you are pumping well water up to the surface, exchanging heat with it and then pumping the water back down again. Is this bad for the environment? If you search the literature you will find many different opinions. My belief is that it is unknown how dangerous this really is. You are not changing the temperature of the water very much in the heat exchange (only a few degrees) so there is no recorded problem with increasing bacterial growth or other temperature effects. And you are not adding or removing anything from the water, just the heat transfer. But think about how much water is moving. Typical open loop systems move around 12 gallons per minute. Does all this water make it back down to the exact aquifer that it came from? You can’t put it back in the same well (due to both regulation and the physics… you need to move it a fair distance away so that the efficiency is preserved). Now imagine that everyone on your street is moving 12 gallons a minute at the same time.  Problems? We don’t really know yet.

What about our closed loop example we discussed earlier? These move an enclosed water+antifreeze mixture around the pipes and do not draw from any well source. Refrigerant needs to be added to the water in high enough concentration to prevent freezing but low enough concentration to ensure good heat transfer and least amount of pipe friction (pure water is one of the best fluids for heat capacity and fluidity). But what if the pipes break?  Even though the pipes are made from high-density polyethylene (HDPE) it is possible. Then the ground is exposed to the antifreeze. In Canada, most antifreeze used is a form of glycol… designed to be benign in case of breakage. So are there any environmental concerns with closed loop? The biggest one in my opinion is the amount of electricity needed to run the compressors and circulating pumps. Even the most efficient equipment is power hungry, and remember that the heat pump needs to run much more often than regular furnaces because the heat being pushed through the house is lower than traditional furnace output.

So having a heat pump is equivalent to having your electric stove turned on most of the time.  Thank goodness that electricity is still cheap. But electricity is not clean… at least not in Ontario yet where only 26% is from renewable energy (more than one third still comes from coal, gas and oil generation).  Are my reduced greenhouse gas emissions from eliminating my old furnace being replaced by higher electricity use?

As you can see, the problems are complex. Each homeowner will fumble through this maze of questions on his own.  Myself, I have spent hours making spreadsheets and running energy analysis programs to see where my focus should be.  But I have yet to reach a slam dunk decision.

There are some breakthroughs coming in the future though. New home construction is adopting heat pump technology with water to water exchange (this involves pipes in your flooring where the warm water flows through and radiates the room). These solutions are more efficient than water to air exchange that is usually installed as a retrofit in a house with regular duct systems.

There is a new technology called Direct eXchange (DX) that is coming on fast. It is a closed loop solution without the need for multiple heat exchangers and circulating pumps… the heat pump refrigerant flows through copper pipes and directly exchanges heat with the ground. But currently those systems are quite new and it is unclear how environmentally sound they really are (Will the copper pipe corrode? What happens if it breaks?) Subsequently, in Canada the DX systems are not covered by rebate yet. I have great hopes for DX though because of the greatly reduced electricity needs for operation. My fingers are crossed.

In conclusion, I believe we are at an exciting time in the heat pump industry. Manufacturers realize that consumers want a sustainable solution that takes in to account the electricity used by the equipment. And with rebates, heat pumps (especially in Canada) are not just for the wealthy anymore.

I am anxiously awaiting the changes in technology and regulation that will come in the next few years.

 

Randy Martin

Randy Martin is a high-tech professional involved in many areas of green energy. He is a graduate of the Canadian Geo-Exchange program (CSA448 Heat Pump Installer) as well as a member of Ottawa Clean Tech (www.ottawagreentech.com), a group of engineers who recommend solutions to residents and business.

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (12)

As an addendum to my article, I wanted to add some hopes/dreams that I think others may extrapolate from my comments.
Let's assume that sometime in the next 20 years that mankind finds a way to create ultracheap and ultraclean electricity with zero GHG emissions. If that happens then I would use electricity-based heating for my home heat and hot water. I would not need a heat pump. In fact, using a heat pump would be less environmentally friendly: wear and tear of compressors/fans requiring replacement, lots of polyethylene piping etc.
So in a way, a heat pump is merely a stop gap until we somehow reach ultraclean electricity.
I think there will be many many 'stop gap' technologies employed over the next 20 or 30 years: communal heat pumps with giant heat sinks servicing many buildings, local wind power, concentrated solar power electricity generation. Each stop gap is important in its own right as long as it reduces green house gases and does not take away from the goal of attaining ultraclean and cheap electricity.
Just my humble opinion.. I am interested in the thoughts of others.

P.S. a really good book I read is:
Turner, Chris: The Geography of Hope, , Random House, 2007
Canadian perspectives on renewable energy and sustainable living
It discusses local and global issues related to energy conservation and generation.

Randy

August 4, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterRandy Martin

Hi Randy - Last year I attended a renewable energy fair and was intrigued by the heat pump solution. But I was turned off by the price tag (greater than $30K) while the government was offering a $7K rebate. The installation would reduce utility costs by 50%. It seemed to me at the time that it would take a lifetime to recover the costs. And that assumed no equipment breakdowns. Presumably things are getting better on this front.

My question to you is as follows: How much energy is used in manufacture and install of the heat pump versus what will be saved throughout it`s operational life.

Steve

August 4, 2009 | Registered CommenterSteve Auger

Hi Steve and others..
Your question hits the nail on the head. How do we really know if a heat pump solution saves the environment?
I remember talking with a friend of a friend who just had a ground source (closed loop) heat pump installed for a new home build. Their home was a monster 4000 sq ft beast with 10 ft ceilings... 3 car garage with SUV, utility car and a luxury car. What I felt from talking with him was that installing a heat pump was his contribution to the environment so that he could justify his current lifestyle. He had no intention of trimming back on energy use or consumption of other resources.
Is that attitude common for others? I hope not.

Heat pumps do wear out. Especially compressors, circulating fans and pumps. anything with moving parts. The current manufacturers warranties are quite good .. 5 years inclusive with 10 year warranty on compressor. I definitely recommend going with a better brand if you can. The piping in closed loop that uses HDPE (high-density polyethylene) is usually warranted for 50 years or more.. but they don't really know yet how long it lasts.
The amount of energy going in to manufacture I do not know... a heat pump is complex. As an example of one of my favorites, look at the ClimateMaster series (http://www.climatemaster.com/index/res_tranquility27_page). The energy of manufacturer would definitely be more than a regular oil/gas furnace, but how much more? 2 times? 10 times?
Energy used in installation of a heat pump is primarily a function of the ground loop piping choices. Wells are dug (200 ft or deeper).. usually 1 well per ton of heating. A typical home of 2000 sq ft would need 5 tons of heat/cool, therefore 5 wells would usually be dug. It's a one-time thing but it takes mechanical energy and labor to dig and install.

I'm rambling here but it is an interesting conversation. :-)

My gut tells me the following (others please let us know your own thoughts):

Only pursue heat pumps under one of the following conditions:
- you are building a new house and you can build to R2000 or higher, and you can use radiant water-water heat with the pump
- you have already made your existing home energy tight (if you are leaking 25% of your heat out the windows/sills/attic then fix that first)
- you have an existing furnace that is old or is energy inefficient (80% or less AFUE)

As an example, for a friend's house I used HOT2000 software to analyze their energy use. I estimated that their existing oil furnace and electricity usage generates 12 tonnes of GHG per year. This is pretty average for most residential homes in Canada.
If they switch to a heat pump the GHG estimate would drop to around 6 tonnes per year. Definitely worthwhile in the micro sense (6 tonnes of GHG per year is equivalent to removing one and a half cars off the road). But the software does not take in to account the energy of manufacture and maintenance as you say.

If you had $30000 to spend on environmental issues, is a heat pump the best choice? sounds like the topic for an interesting article. :-)

August 5, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterRandy Martin

Hi Randy,
I had a two-well ground source heat pump installed in my new-construction custom house and it ran with no issues other than an intermittent relay for over 8 years.

Other than the capital costs, I 'felt' I was saving money over heating/cooling with electricity or gas, especially since we didn't have natural gas in the neighborhood until the last year we owned the place.

The biggest issue I had was the fact that the HVAC contractor couldn't install/route large enough air ducts for more efficient heating / cooling and noise reduction... heat pump furnaces are on a lot and a high volume fan through small ducting is very noisy!

I think this may be an important issue for why heat pumps aren't as popular as they could be.

August 5, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterMark Roberts

This is a great thread. Mark highlights some really important points.

Your installer should have talked with you about your ducting options and choice of heat pump. As Mark says, the amount of heat per unit volume being pushed through the ducts is much less with the heat pump than with gas/oil furnace. So you need to push more air through over longer periods (almost twice the duty cycle of a combustible furnace).

I have seen some installations go with hi-speed mini-ducts in place of regular metal ductwork. e.g. (www.hi-velocity.com).
I have seen some installations go with a heat pump that has multi-stage fans... so it blows at 1/2 the speed of regular fans for most of the time. Less noise but then you need to have your heat pump running almost all the time on cold days.
In all cases they should have proper vibration dampers installed and proper elbowing to reduce noise.. hopefully they did that in your case.

Everything is doable but it is hard to get all the options set just right. And people are too busy to be able to research every little nuance of the technology.
Doesn't leave a very good impression about the state of the industry.

August 5, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterRandy Martin

In the UK its downs to a lack of knowledge and understanding from home owners. We have to educate people about heat pump technology and the easiest way to do that is through local tradesmen such as plumbers, electricians and gas technicians. These are the guys who can help heat pump companies form a better awareness amongst home owners.

August 10, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterics heat pumps

I found your blog very informative and learned something from it. Keep it up

August 10, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterDiwakar Methil

I totally agree with 'ics heat pumps', education is key for the wider use of heat pumps and to raise awareness of the community.

August 25, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterHeat Pumps

That is a great article. Thank you for sharing.

September 2, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterChuck

Taco pumps are known for efficiency which means that they are friendly towards the environment and also more money in your wallet...these are great choices for your next heat pump.

September 11, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterTaco Pump

If the government will not be supporting this, then this new kind of technology will just go to waste..heat pumps should be used, but there are only few people doing this because of some regulations that are too hard to observe..

September 14, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterheat pumps

Geothermal heat pumps works with the help of underground temperature...Thats why it works really long.....

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>